Predatory journals: academic toxins

-

Indian academia is sick. It needs to detoxify. Urgently.

The context

Difference between an authentic journal and a predatory journal, put simplistically

 Researchers disseminate their findings by having them published in academic journals. Sometimes, a variety of journals related to a variety of fields are published by the same firm, and such firms are called publishing houses. These journals offer the services of having papers reviewed by experts before their publication (so the readers only get authentic science) and the distribution of papers (so everyone knows what discoveries have taken place). In this model, institutions subscribe to these journals i.e. the reader pays to read the papers. (Another noteworthy point is that researchers, after submitting their findings to a journal, also hand over the copyrights to that information to that journal.)

 The open-access movement aimed to make all knowledge free for everyone, so that researchers with limited funds could also access what others had published. The basic question was, why should the scientific community pay publishing houses for information that they were generating themselves? The open-access model obviously worked differently than before, it is the authors and not the readers who pay the publishing fee.

 With every good idea, also comes its corruption. The same happened with open-access publishing. Several open-access journals and publishing houses sprang up that offered to publish a researcher's findings, upon payment of fees. The problematic part is, this fee is akin to a bribe where the journal editor bypasses some quality checks and the researcher gets a paper to his/her credit, even if it contains substandard content.

 For example, predatory journals may have bogus editors with non existent identities or exaggerated credentials. Without a real editor on the team, there is no check on the quality of the research published in that journal.

Here is a chronologically arranged description of the development of this fraudulent practice.
------------------------------------------------------------

Beall (2012): Predatory publishers are corrupting open access

Dr. Jeffrey Beall is, according to me, the hero in this war against predatory journals. In 2012, he wrote to the large audience of Nature about the perils of this new kind of publishing. He went on to set up the famous blog Scholarly Open Access. This blog boldly called out several villains in the publishing business, and is unfortunately no longer available (any guesses why?). Beall talked about the characteristics of predatory journals, and how to spot them. What disturbs me the most is this observation:
"Many purport to be headquartered in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada or Australia but really hail from Pakistan, India or Nigeria."
and this statement of his:
"Perhaps nowhere are these abuses more acute than in India, where new predatory publishers or journals emerge each week."
These kind of observations are seriously embarrassing for any sincere Indian researcher. If you're inclined to think that this is yet another conspiracy to downplay ("the great") Indian science of ancient origins, hold your horses. Beall's article was the beginning of a series of investigations with devastating results.
------------------------------------------------------------

Bohannon (2013): Who's Afraid of Peer Review?

Bohannon sent different versions of a fake paper to 304 open access journals (he wrote a computer program to generate these different versions using the same content). 157 of these accepted the paper.
"About one-third of the journals targeted in the sting are based in India -- overtly or as revealed by the location of editors and bank accounts -- making it the world's largest base for open access publishing; and among the India-based journals in my sample, 64 accepted the fatally flawed papers and only 15 rejected them."
Bohannon offers an interactive map which shows the "tangled web" of predatory publishing, which shows threads connecting locations of editors, publishers and bank accounts of these predatory journals. While most of the map is clean, it is mortifying to see the density of spots that covers the whole of India. Apart from this, there are2 explicit references: a predatory publisher from Mumbai, another editor from Bijapur. These are not the mentions we need, but the mentions we deserve. Makes me cringe.
------------------------------------------------------------

Seethapathy et al. (2014): India's scientific publication in predatory journals: need for regulating quality of Indian science and education

The problem of predatory publishing was also investigated from the Indian perspective by 3 authors from the homeland, and they concluded that "it is evident that India is lacking in monitoring the research being conducted at different higher educational and research institutes." They note the criteria that specifically encourage such behavior: such as looking at how many papers published as opposed to what is published, for awards of degrees as well as tenure or promotions.


Comments

  1. w7i7June 3, 2017 at 8:40 AM

    Yes, I'm very troubled by the prominence of pseudo-science too. Don't know about the FNA lobby to comment on that yet. :(

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Darwin's Lost World - Part II

-
<< Previous page So what do we (did Darwin) know by now (then) ? That living creatures from the very very ancient past (we're talking in terms of millions of years) were often found preserved in the rock record. That we could make out some things about the past environments from these fossils. Fossils showed specific associations: you saw only certain types and groups of fossils in certain suites of rocks (belonging to different periods of geological time). There came a dead end at the base of the Cambrian. Scientists like to call this the Cambrian Explosion today, but back then, many of them were more inclined to dismiss this either as a figment of the imagination of relatively smaller body of researchers, or simply, incomplete/inaccurate science. That the Creator had made us all, was the popular view. 3 theories emerged to explain why we see the Cambrian Explosion (if it even is a real thing!): Charles Lyell Interestingly, it is said that Lyell was...
Read more

On Darwin's Lost World

-
Image
Martin Brasier was a prolific paleontologist. And from what little I know of him, he must have been a pretty cool guy. I recently read his book "Darwin's Lost World" and it was definitely one of the better decisions of my life. On Darwin Thankfully, even the most plebeian of science curricula finds it worthwhile to describe Charles Darwin's scientific accomplishments. To me, all through childhood, Darwin represented my superiority to the apes. When someone said Darwin, I would get a mental picture of an ape gradually turning human. That's an overly simplistic picture, but then again, there is so much to learn about everything  that one doesn't quite know where to start. Source The rock record is the only thing that can give us a picture of the ancient Earth. Most other branches of science can tell you what the Earth is like, and why it is the way it is. But it was Geology that first told us what the Earth was  like, and bits of why it w...
Read more

What is ENSO? Page 2 - SSTs and trade winds

-
Image
  This is Page 2 of the sub-series "What is ENSO?". If you haven't already, please read Page 1 first. For convenience, keep that page open in a different tab. = = = What is ENSO? In the previous post , we learnt to identify ENSO phases from the perspective of sea surface temperature anomalies . In this post, I'm going to answer a question that no one really asked ―  What if I wanted to identify ENSO phases from the perspective of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) instead? What if, for no good reason but because I felt like it, I wanted to do away with the "anomalies" bit? Looking at SSTs instead of SST anomalies makes matters unnecessarily complicated, but we're going to do it anyway because it also teaches us a lot. In the image below, I've plotted SSTs from the HadISST dataset. These are mean SSTs for the months of December, January and February (DJF) over all years from 1872-2009. Why did we select the months of DJF? Because ENSO events can be seen...
Read more