Climate Change: The Fundamentals - Part II

-


Man or nature?

The Question

Previously, we saw that anthropogenic emissions are causing global warming and climate change. But how do we know they are the main cause of climate change? How do we know that modern climate change is indeed caused by mankind?

Scientists who study past climates on our planet have discovered large climatic variations in the Earth's past. For example, temperatures in several places were 5 - 12 oC higher than today, around 55 million years ago. If the Earth could show such large variations with no humans present on it, how can we be sure that the climate change we see today is caused by humans? After all, modern climate change has only caused a change of about 1 oC so far (on average). What if modern climate change is simply natural?

The Answer

Scientists can simulate the climate system using computer models. We can compare results from climate models with actual meteorological observations to see how well they match. The first figure shows three situations for the years 1860 - 2000.

[ Note: In climate parlance, a forcing is anything that affects the climate system. ]

Situation (a) simulates the climate but only using natural forcings. This estimates the role of the natural variability of the climate system. As is evident, the grey region (model) and the red line (observations) do match sometimes, but not very well.

Situation (b) estimates only anthropogenic variability. This time, the grey and the red seem to match more than situation (a). The model results seem to be coming more in tune with the observations.

Situation (c) shows what happens when the model accounts for both the natural and the anthropogenic forcings. This is obviously the most realistic of the three situations. It also shows the best match between observations and model results.

If climate change was dominantly the result of natural causes, situation (a) would have shown the best match.  Instead, situation (b) shows a better match than situation (a). We see that natural causes alone cannot explain modern climate change. This is how we know that anthropogenic forcings play a vital role in changing the climate. 


Source: IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001)

This figure was published in the year 2001 but the results still hold. In fact, the next IPCC report published in 2007 examined this even more rigorously. The following figure shows the same comparison between climate models and observations. The blue regions show model results when only natural forcings are taken into account. The pink regions show model results when both natural and anthropogenic forcings are included. We see the same result as we saw before. In every single region examined, the observations cannot be explained by natural forcings alone. The difference lies in the man-made forcings. This result also holds when we look at the whole world, or the land and the oceans separately.


Source: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007)


Thus, mankind is indeed the reason behind modern climate change.

When we remember that the observed global warming is in the order of 1 oC so far, and that natural causes can cause much more warming, we realise that the question "Man or nature?" was a tricky one. The Earth has indeed gone through larger temperature fluctuations in the past, but what we see today is the result of our own actions. This is important to understand to decide what steps need to be taken to solve this problem.

-----

Points to ponder:

  1. The IPCC reports are published only after they have been approved by all the governments involved. This means that the Third Assessment Report - published in 2001, 18 years ago (!) - informed all governments that the crisis was not natural but was our fault. Why have governments not taken drastic steps to reduce emissions?
  2. In your opinion, have the governments in your country taken satisfactory measures for solving this crisis?
-----

P. S.  Excellent rendition here - "What's Really Warming The World?"  Much recommended.

Also, this is not the only way to reach the same answer. Other ways will be discussed in other posts.

-----

For email subscription:




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

हिमाचल की आपदा और नागरिकों से आग्रह

-
Image
हिमाचल प्रदेश से एक के बाद एक भयावह विडीओ और तस्वीरें सामने आ रही हैं। भारी बारिश के कारण कई क्षेत्रों में बाढ़ जैसे हालात हैं। इस संदर्भ में हिमाचल प्रदेश और पूरे देश के नागरिकों से आग्रह है कि वे इन चार ज़रूरी बातों पर गौर करें :   (१) बाढ़ क्षेत्रीकरण में ढील देना आपदाओं को निमंत्रण देने जैसे है अलग अलग विशेषज्ञों द्वारा ये बात बार-बार उठायी जा चुकी है, पर फिर भी नज़र-अन्दाज़ करी जाती है। हर नदी का एक बाढ़-क्षेत्र होता है और उस क्षेत्र में निर्माण करना जोखिम की बात है। प्रशासन के द्वारा बाढ़ क्षेत्र में निर्माण करने की अनुमति देना उचित नहीं है। ये नागरिकों का दायित्व नहीं होना चाहिए, बल्कि ये प्रशासन का दायित्व होना चाहिए की नदियों के बाढ़ क्षेत्र में कोई निर्माण ना हो, ख़ास कर कोई भी सार्वजनिक निर्माण तो क़तई ना हो। बाढ़ क्षेत्रीकरण से कई लोग पहले से वाक़िफ़ होंगे। ये सिर्फ़ पहाड़ी इलाक़ों में ही नहीं, पूरे देश में ज़रूरी ही। इसके बारे में और जानने के लिए ये लेख पढ़ें (अंग्रेज़ी में)। ये ट्वीट भी ज़रूर देखें: भूविज्ञान विशेषज्ञ ने मनाली के एक विडीओ में ढेर होती हुई रोड को &qu
Read more

What is a monsoon?

-
Image
Note: This post is written primarily for an Indian audience. - - - What leads to a strong or a weak monsoon? What will happen to the monsoon as the world warms? What happens to the monsoon in an El Niño year? -- These are popular and practical questions that the reader has probably heard, read or thought about. This post has no answers for any of these questions, but instead focuses on a more foundational and theoretical question -- What is a monsoon? Easy! Monsoon means the rainy season, right? This first order approximation is generally accepted as universal truth, since it works for a large part of the country. People equate monsoon with rains, especially summer rains. But what about winter rains? They are usually labelled as "post monsoon", and anything else can be put under "pre-monsoon". If you're a bit more nuanced, you may even label some non-summer rains as "non-monsoon". But the general discussion around rains in India tends to revolve around
Read more

Albedo, and why you should care about it

-
Image
I'm a big fan of albedo . I think this concept is very relevant to the climate system, especially to modern climate change. So this is my attempt to familiarize the reader with this concept and show its practical applicability. What is albedo? In simple terms, it is the ability of a surface to reflect sunlight. A surface with high albedo reflects more sunlight, a surface with low albedo reflects less sunlight. Source There are more general terms, such as reflectance, which are used in other sciences. For the sake of climate, we are primarily interested in sunlight. Albedo values lie between 0-1. The overall, average albedo of the Earth is 0.30. This means that 30% of sunlight is reflected back. The rest is absorbed and radiated as heat. Greenhouse gases tend to trap the radiated heat. In the context of a warming planet, it might have been more comfortable if the Earth's albedo was higher. A higher albedo would mean lesser sunlight would be absorbed, lesser heat would be radiate
Read more