Simply put: Mundoli et al. (2022)

-

This post is based on the paper "Climate change: the missing discourse in the Indian Parliament" by Seema Mundoli and others, in Environmental Research: Climate. The authors studied Parliamentary Questions (PQs) related to climate change raised in the Lok Sabha between 1999-2019. The study is designed to answer four critical questions related to PQs on climate change.

First, the authors ask, How often are PQs raised about climate change? The answer is only about 0.3% of the time.

Second, the authors ask, Are vulnerable constituency interests being represented in the Parliament? The answer, sadly, is No ("..there was no evidence for climate vulnerability or gender to have any relationship with the number of PQs asked"). To me, this suggests that our Parliamentarians have not yet appreciated differential vulnerability to climate change, and that there is much scope for granularity in their understanding of climate change.

Third, the authors ask, What kind of questions do parliamentarians ask? The answer is interesting. Impacts of climate change received the most attention, followed by the concept of mitigation. Adaptation was raised in only 3.9% of the PQs. Finally, the impacts on socially or economically vulnerable groups were raised only inn 0.007% of the PQs, reinforcing what the second answer above told us.

Fourth, the authors ask, Where do parliamentarians get their information from? And this, to me, begets the most interesting answer of all. Our honorable ministers referred to a source of information only 10% of the time! To me, this is both appalling and troubling. The lack of appreciation of the importance of citing a source in the first place precludes any further discussion of the quality of the source! Thankfully, studies from credible sources (IPCC, United Nations, World Bank) seem to have been cited the most among the meagre 10%. Newspaper articles were the next most cited source.

This was a simple study and it should be possible for the lay reader to understand most, if not all, of the paper. I will refrain from drawing too many conclusions here, because of my limited understanding of Parliamentary functioning and my limited ability to place these results in the most appropriate context. But to me, the results are not surprising and quantitatively reinforce the general perception that there is substantial scope for improvement in the quality of climate change discussions happening in our country as well as during the Parliamentary Question Hour. There is much more our leaders can do and should do.

-----

To subscribe to such posts, go here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Darwin's Lost World - Part II

-
<< Previous page So what do we (did Darwin) know by now (then) ? That living creatures from the very very ancient past (we're talking in terms of millions of years) were often found preserved in the rock record. That we could make out some things about the past environments from these fossils. Fossils showed specific associations: you saw only certain types and groups of fossils in certain suites of rocks (belonging to different periods of geological time). There came a dead end at the base of the Cambrian. Scientists like to call this the Cambrian Explosion today, but back then, many of them were more inclined to dismiss this either as a figment of the imagination of relatively smaller body of researchers, or simply, incomplete/inaccurate science. That the Creator had made us all, was the popular view. 3 theories emerged to explain why we see the Cambrian Explosion (if it even is a real thing!): Charles Lyell Interestingly, it is said that Lyell was...
Read more

On Darwin's Lost World

-
Image
Martin Brasier was a prolific paleontologist. And from what little I know of him, he must have been a pretty cool guy. I recently read his book "Darwin's Lost World" and it was definitely one of the better decisions of my life. On Darwin Thankfully, even the most plebeian of science curricula finds it worthwhile to describe Charles Darwin's scientific accomplishments. To me, all through childhood, Darwin represented my superiority to the apes. When someone said Darwin, I would get a mental picture of an ape gradually turning human. That's an overly simplistic picture, but then again, there is so much to learn about everything  that one doesn't quite know where to start. Source The rock record is the only thing that can give us a picture of the ancient Earth. Most other branches of science can tell you what the Earth is like, and why it is the way it is. But it was Geology that first told us what the Earth was  like, and bits of why it w...
Read more

What is ENSO? Page 2 - SSTs and trade winds

-
Image
  This is Page 2 of the sub-series "What is ENSO?". If you haven't already, please read Page 1 first. For convenience, keep that page open in a different tab. = = = What is ENSO? In the previous post , we learnt to identify ENSO phases from the perspective of sea surface temperature anomalies . In this post, I'm going to answer a question that no one really asked ―  What if I wanted to identify ENSO phases from the perspective of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) instead? What if, for no good reason but because I felt like it, I wanted to do away with the "anomalies" bit? Looking at SSTs instead of SST anomalies makes matters unnecessarily complicated, but we're going to do it anyway because it also teaches us a lot. In the image below, I've plotted SSTs from the HadISST dataset. These are mean SSTs for the months of December, January and February (DJF) over all years from 1872-2009. Why did we select the months of DJF? Because ENSO events can be seen...
Read more