On Darwin's Lost World

-

Martin Brasier was a prolific paleontologist. And from what little I know of him, he must have been a pretty cool guy. I recently read his book "Darwin's Lost World" and it was definitely one of the better decisions of my life.

On Darwin


Thankfully, even the most plebeian of science curricula finds it worthwhile to describe Charles Darwin's scientific accomplishments. To me, all through childhood, Darwin represented my superiority to the apes. When someone said Darwin, I would get a mental picture of an ape gradually turning human. That's an overly simplistic picture, but then again, there is so much to learn about everything that one doesn't quite know where to start.

Source


The rock record is the only thing that can give us a picture of the ancient Earth. Most other branches of science can tell you what the Earth is like, and why it is the way it is. But it was Geology that first told us what the Earth was like, and bits of why it was that way. When Darwin was trying to make Evolution popular, he was faced with a problem. His basic premise needed support from fossils and no one would (quite reasonably) believe him about evolution unless he could show evidence for it. It's relevant to remember that he was up against the endorsers of Creationism - roughly, the idea that Man is a special creation of God.

What a pity then for this brilliant scientist to find that while he could trace some patterns across species that showed evolution (fossils got gradually simpler in reversed time), he came to a dead end near the Cambrian.

The Cambrian


Geologists divide geological time into various eras and periods (and some more terms). Geological time is the time the lapse of which one sees in the rocks: from the way they were deposited, from the way they were changed, from the way they were even destroyed. Watched the Jurassic Park/World? The Jurassic represents a span of time, and everything associated with that span of time too.

Another span of time similar to the Jurassic period (ca 201-145 million years ago) is the Cambrian (ca 541-485 million years ago) period. It's evident that Cambrian rocks would be much older than the Jurassic rocks, and would normally be found below the Jurassic ones. So far so good.

Why might you have heard of the Cambrian? Because of the Cambrian Explosion. Scientists had been finding different kinds of fossils from different rocks representing various time periods. However, it would all begin at the base of the Cambrian. Imagine playing evolution in reverse in one's head, and then imagine coming to an abrupt full stop right at the base of the Cambrian every single time. Why was there such a silence before the Cambrian? Was there nobody around before that?

Darwin's problem


So here (back in the 1860s) is our revolutionary evolutionary researcher trying to tell the world that we are not unique creations of Divine Providence, rather, we are just one branch of the Tree of Life, where everything begins with a single root. Except for the part that they couldn't trace the Tree beyond (older than) the Cambrian. One might guess that they had simply reached the root, but this:

Source

frankly, does not look like the root, does it? That is Fallotaspis, a Cambrian fossil. Note that the concept of a cell had been put forward by Robert Hooke as far back as 1665, so it was obvious even in the late 19th century that Fallotaspis, a multicellular organism could not possibly be the end (or the start, if you like). Apparently, the Cambrian shows a sudden bloom in life and diversity (an "explosion") with fossils as complex as this emerging out of nothingness. How is that even possible? If Darwin had to replace Creationism, he had to show an ancestor to this being too.

Where was the root? Was there a root? Was there a world before the Cambrian that Darwin could see, but seemed lost to the rest of the world?

Next page >>


Psst...like such posts?
 

Comments

  1. Its a wonderful world!August 31, 2015 at 5:30 AM

    Does it make sense to think that cambrian period was simply a period when a great deal of fossilization happened because of some environmental factors?

    As in, all the diversity in fauna didn't just "appear" out of nothingness, they were already developed, but weren't recorded as fossils due to some reason.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. w7i7August 31, 2015 at 6:31 AM

      Yes, certainly! I'm going to follow up with more posts about this.

      Delete
    2. Its a wonderful world!August 31, 2015 at 6:49 AM

      Thats great! Especially since you are someone who has a relevant background in this field.

      Delete
  2. Its a wonderful world!August 31, 2015 at 5:31 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownAugust 31, 2015 at 2:37 PM

    It was a fun read, but the fact that it ended suddenly feels odd. Just out of curiosity, is the topic too large to be covered in a single blog post?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. w7i7September 1, 2015 at 2:15 AM

      There's going to be a follow up post really soon. :)
      I could have compressed the topic in a single post, but that runs the risk of making it too tiring a read. The idea is that science is not strenuous or arcane, and most reasoning (even between diverse fields) remains essentially simple.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

हिमाचल की आपदा और नागरिकों से आग्रह

-
Image
हिमाचल प्रदेश से एक के बाद एक भयावह विडीओ और तस्वीरें सामने आ रही हैं। भारी बारिश के कारण कई क्षेत्रों में बाढ़ जैसे हालात हैं। इस संदर्भ में हिमाचल प्रदेश और पूरे देश के नागरिकों से आग्रह है कि वे इन चार ज़रूरी बातों पर गौर करें :   (१) बाढ़ क्षेत्रीकरण में ढील देना आपदाओं को निमंत्रण देने जैसे है अलग अलग विशेषज्ञों द्वारा ये बात बार-बार उठायी जा चुकी है, पर फिर भी नज़र-अन्दाज़ करी जाती है। हर नदी का एक बाढ़-क्षेत्र होता है और उस क्षेत्र में निर्माण करना जोखिम की बात है। प्रशासन के द्वारा बाढ़ क्षेत्र में निर्माण करने की अनुमति देना उचित नहीं है। ये नागरिकों का दायित्व नहीं होना चाहिए, बल्कि ये प्रशासन का दायित्व होना चाहिए की नदियों के बाढ़ क्षेत्र में कोई निर्माण ना हो, ख़ास कर कोई भी सार्वजनिक निर्माण तो क़तई ना हो। बाढ़ क्षेत्रीकरण से कई लोग पहले से वाक़िफ़ होंगे। ये सिर्फ़ पहाड़ी इलाक़ों में ही नहीं, पूरे देश में ज़रूरी ही। इसके बारे में और जानने के लिए ये लेख पढ़ें (अंग्रेज़ी में)। ये ट्वीट भी ज़रूर देखें: भूविज्ञान विशेषज्ञ ने मनाली के एक विडीओ में ढेर होती हुई रोड को &qu
Read more

What is a monsoon?

-
Image
Note: This post is written primarily for an Indian audience. - - - What leads to a strong or a weak monsoon? What will happen to the monsoon as the world warms? What happens to the monsoon in an El Niño year? -- These are popular and practical questions that the reader has probably heard, read or thought about. This post has no answers for any of these questions, but instead focuses on a more foundational and theoretical question -- What is a monsoon? Easy! Monsoon means the rainy season, right? This first order approximation is generally accepted as universal truth, since it works for a large part of the country. People equate monsoon with rains, especially summer rains. But what about winter rains? They are usually labelled as "post monsoon", and anything else can be put under "pre-monsoon". If you're a bit more nuanced, you may even label some non-summer rains as "non-monsoon". But the general discussion around rains in India tends to revolve around
Read more

Albedo, and why you should care about it

-
Image
I'm a big fan of albedo . I think this concept is very relevant to the climate system, especially to modern climate change. So this is my attempt to familiarize the reader with this concept and show its practical applicability. What is albedo? In simple terms, it is the ability of a surface to reflect sunlight. A surface with high albedo reflects more sunlight, a surface with low albedo reflects less sunlight. Source There are more general terms, such as reflectance, which are used in other sciences. For the sake of climate, we are primarily interested in sunlight. Albedo values lie between 0-1. The overall, average albedo of the Earth is 0.30. This means that 30% of sunlight is reflected back. The rest is absorbed and radiated as heat. Greenhouse gases tend to trap the radiated heat. In the context of a warming planet, it might have been more comfortable if the Earth's albedo was higher. A higher albedo would mean lesser sunlight would be absorbed, lesser heat would be radiate
Read more