Where did we come from? Part IV

-

Previously we discussed
Part II : Class Mammalia --> Order Primates
Part III : Family Hominidae

I recommend you go through Part III if you'd like a recap.

Our report card says we've successfully filtered our genes down to the tribe Hominini (which is why we're called hominins) which is then divided into 3 subtribes: subtribe Panina (who we've outsmarted), subtribe Australopithecina (who we've outlived) and subtribe Hominina (that's us).

After this long-winded journey that weened out trait after trait that wouldn't do, we arrived at the genus Homo.


HOMO

A lot of us are aware that the we belong to the species Homo sapiens. What is not common knowledge is that all species belonging to the genus Homo are technically humans. Homo, in Latin, means 'human' and it's obvious that when this genus was named so, we didn't expect to find remains of other extinct human species. The second part of our name, "sapiens", means "intelligent" or "wise" (you might recognize the same root, sapere, in the word sapiosexual or sapient). Let's find out a little bit about the other humans that didn't make it far enough to give us company.

Species that were our direct ancestors

Homo ergaster : 'The handyman', found with tools, in Africa. It is possible that this isn't a distinct species (that the specimens which are currently said to belong to this species, don't), but if it was, it's one of our ancestors.

Homo heidelbergensis: Named so because they were first found near the city of Heidelberg, in Germany. It is believed that the African population of H. heidelbergensis gave rise to the H. sapiens.

Species that weren't our direct ancestors

Homo erectus : or the erect humans. There is confusion regarding H. ergaster and H. erectus. If they really were two different species, then this would be a descendant of H. ergaster. Remains found in China and Indonesia.

Homo neanderthalis : We all recognise this name, which literally means 'humans from the Neander Valley (Germany)'. It refers to the species that descended from the European population of H. heidelbergensis but were not our direct ancestors.

Homo floresienses : Found from Flores, Indonesia for the first time, this species' diminutive form leads to it being nicknamed hobbits. It is believed that this species co-existed with, and might have been driven to extinction by, modern humans. Sounds familiar?

Species we're not sure about

Homo habilis : Lived in Africa, also called 'the handy man' because its fossils have been found accompanied with tools made of stone.

Homo rudolfensis: Named so because it was found near Lake Rudolf in Kenya. We don't know the color of its nose.

Homo antecessor: Or 'the explorers'. Earliest humans in Europe.


WHY IS EVERYTHING SO VAGUE?

It's evident that we have large holes in our knowledge of our ancestors. Why would this be, if we have intelligent and motivated teams of paleoanthropologists actively researching our roots?

Paleontology depends heavily on the following things:
- the preservation of fossils
- their discovery
- their identification, and
- their analysis

As it turns out, each of these steps has its own sets of problems. For instance, consider the tiny odds that a skull or a femur of a dead human will be buried soon enough so that it is not broken, pulverized or eroded. Consider the tiny odds that scientists will look in the very same place where these fossils are lying in wait, especially noting how urbanization covers our planet with concrete and clay. Next, imagine the difficulties of having to first define a new species on the basis of specimens that might be only partially preserved, and then wondering whether a specimen belongs to a previously defined species or not. Last, but of paramount difficulty, is the question of what a particular morphological character means. Do we look at the jaw of a set of fossils and try to understand how they were related, or the teeth? Which evolutionary path did a lineage take? Does descent even unambiguously show up in the hard parts, or were there subtle signatures that were not ossified?

Paleoanthropologists face a variety of problems in deciphering a patchy fossil record that sometimes leaves us with more questions than answers. However, there's no doubt that it is an extremely exciting field of research, where each discovery brings us closer to the knowledge of where we came from.



If you'd like to keep up with more posts on Paleoanthropology:

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

हिमाचल की आपदा और नागरिकों से आग्रह

-
Image
हिमाचल प्रदेश से एक के बाद एक भयावह विडीओ और तस्वीरें सामने आ रही हैं। भारी बारिश के कारण कई क्षेत्रों में बाढ़ जैसे हालात हैं। इस संदर्भ में हिमाचल प्रदेश और पूरे देश के नागरिकों से आग्रह है कि वे इन चार ज़रूरी बातों पर गौर करें :   (१) बाढ़ क्षेत्रीकरण में ढील देना आपदाओं को निमंत्रण देने जैसे है अलग अलग विशेषज्ञों द्वारा ये बात बार-बार उठायी जा चुकी है, पर फिर भी नज़र-अन्दाज़ करी जाती है। हर नदी का एक बाढ़-क्षेत्र होता है और उस क्षेत्र में निर्माण करना जोखिम की बात है। प्रशासन के द्वारा बाढ़ क्षेत्र में निर्माण करने की अनुमति देना उचित नहीं है। ये नागरिकों का दायित्व नहीं होना चाहिए, बल्कि ये प्रशासन का दायित्व होना चाहिए की नदियों के बाढ़ क्षेत्र में कोई निर्माण ना हो, ख़ास कर कोई भी सार्वजनिक निर्माण तो क़तई ना हो। बाढ़ क्षेत्रीकरण से कई लोग पहले से वाक़िफ़ होंगे। ये सिर्फ़ पहाड़ी इलाक़ों में ही नहीं, पूरे देश में ज़रूरी ही। इसके बारे में और जानने के लिए ये लेख पढ़ें (अंग्रेज़ी में)। ये ट्वीट भी ज़रूर देखें: भूविज्ञान विशेषज्ञ ने मनाली के एक विडीओ में ढेर होती हुई रोड को &qu
Read more

What is a monsoon?

-
Image
Note: This post is written primarily for an Indian audience. - - - What leads to a strong or a weak monsoon? What will happen to the monsoon as the world warms? What happens to the monsoon in an El Niño year? -- These are popular and practical questions that the reader has probably heard, read or thought about. This post has no answers for any of these questions, but instead focuses on a more foundational and theoretical question -- What is a monsoon? Easy! Monsoon means the rainy season, right? This first order approximation is generally accepted as universal truth, since it works for a large part of the country. People equate monsoon with rains, especially summer rains. But what about winter rains? They are usually labelled as "post monsoon", and anything else can be put under "pre-monsoon". If you're a bit more nuanced, you may even label some non-summer rains as "non-monsoon". But the general discussion around rains in India tends to revolve around
Read more

Albedo, and why you should care about it

-
Image
I'm a big fan of albedo . I think this concept is very relevant to the climate system, especially to modern climate change. So this is my attempt to familiarize the reader with this concept and show its practical applicability. What is albedo? In simple terms, it is the ability of a surface to reflect sunlight. A surface with high albedo reflects more sunlight, a surface with low albedo reflects less sunlight. Source There are more general terms, such as reflectance, which are used in other sciences. For the sake of climate, we are primarily interested in sunlight. Albedo values lie between 0-1. The overall, average albedo of the Earth is 0.30. This means that 30% of sunlight is reflected back. The rest is absorbed and radiated as heat. Greenhouse gases tend to trap the radiated heat. In the context of a warming planet, it might have been more comfortable if the Earth's albedo was higher. A higher albedo would mean lesser sunlight would be absorbed, lesser heat would be radiate
Read more