Public discussions in the time of crises

-

As the corona crisis as well as the fight against it marches on, the public discussion is beginning to remind many of us of the discourse around the climate crisis. Both are global crises which must be solved with public policies aligned with scientific understanding. And both seem marked by similar misplaced good intentions and disunited efforts - disunited not just by chance but also by false dichotomies ("environment/epidemiology vs economics").

 As I write this, I am thinking of the thousands of scientists around the country who are, to varying extents, able and eager to help during the corona crisis. I write this to extend an invitation to scientists to join public conversations, with the hope that the courtesies being requested for the corona conversation would also be extended to the climate conversation.

1  You will not become an epidemiologist / climate scientist overnight — and you shouldn't.

Julia Gog, a mathematical epidemiologist, wrote a remarkable article on how physicists can help with COVID-19 modelling. It is a must-read if you are itching to help, whether you are a physicist or not and whether you have tried to model the epidemic or not. The central point remains - It does not help to rediscover known results. But it is not merely a question of "do unto others" regarding respect for expertise; it is also a question of best utilizing your own expertise. Why should you try to become an epidemiologist or a climate scientist to help? Both crises are multi-dimensional. If only one expertise could answer all questions, it would hardly turn into a global crisis. You are needed in your own role.

2  Go upstream.

Most climate scientists are regularly stumped by how little concern their ominous discoveries are eliciting. Part of the problem is that the discussion revolves more around the inclinations or associations of who is talking about those results. Bias is a real and important problem and it must be called out. However, as scientists, we have the luxury of going upstream in the flow of information and deciding issues based on scientific results rather than political or media biases. Biases should be identified on the basis of scientific results, and not the other way round. There will always be multiple conversations for you to contribute to but there is great benefit to amplifying the right conversation.

3  Avoid false dichotomies.

The debate is not "climate vs economics" or "public health vs economics". The actual conflict is science vs pseudo-science. (The same principle could be extended to history vs pseudo-history and economics vs pseudo-economics, etc.) Science is only one factor in decision-making, and neither climate scientists nor epidemiologists claim it is the most important one. However, it must be recognized that the scientific factor is often the most precisely known and non-negotiable. We cannot negotiate with carbon dioxide to trap less heat in the atmosphere, but we can use economic tools such as subsidies to incentivize industrial processes that produce less carbon dioxide. Even with due recognition of the fact that some factors are more "final" than others, such dichotomies only divide people who are fighting the same crisis. If you must divide people into groups, consider who operates on the basis of most information, not on different kinds of information. Such a dichotomy would also reveal the basis and necessity of academic camaraderie; it is not professional alliance but professional values that put us on the same side. (These values are hardly restricted to the academia though!) A quest for the greater good must not overlook the greater bad.


It can be quite unsettling to be a scientist in a field unrelated to the ongoing crisis. In such a situation, we can all help by raising awareness in our respective capacities. I wish for a world where more academic honesty and rigour is brought to public conversations. But if the climate conversation has taught me anything, it is that one would be remiss to extrapolate academic values onto the whole world.
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁

 To subscribe to such posts:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

हिमाचल की आपदा और नागरिकों से आग्रह

-
Image
हिमाचल प्रदेश से एक के बाद एक भयावह विडीओ और तस्वीरें सामने आ रही हैं। भारी बारिश के कारण कई क्षेत्रों में बाढ़ जैसे हालात हैं। इस संदर्भ में हिमाचल प्रदेश और पूरे देश के नागरिकों से आग्रह है कि वे इन चार ज़रूरी बातों पर गौर करें :   (१) बाढ़ क्षेत्रीकरण में ढील देना आपदाओं को निमंत्रण देने जैसे है अलग अलग विशेषज्ञों द्वारा ये बात बार-बार उठायी जा चुकी है, पर फिर भी नज़र-अन्दाज़ करी जाती है। हर नदी का एक बाढ़-क्षेत्र होता है और उस क्षेत्र में निर्माण करना जोखिम की बात है। प्रशासन के द्वारा बाढ़ क्षेत्र में निर्माण करने की अनुमति देना उचित नहीं है। ये नागरिकों का दायित्व नहीं होना चाहिए, बल्कि ये प्रशासन का दायित्व होना चाहिए की नदियों के बाढ़ क्षेत्र में कोई निर्माण ना हो, ख़ास कर कोई भी सार्वजनिक निर्माण तो क़तई ना हो। बाढ़ क्षेत्रीकरण से कई लोग पहले से वाक़िफ़ होंगे। ये सिर्फ़ पहाड़ी इलाक़ों में ही नहीं, पूरे देश में ज़रूरी ही। इसके बारे में और जानने के लिए ये लेख पढ़ें (अंग्रेज़ी में)। ये ट्वीट भी ज़रूर देखें: भूविज्ञान विशेषज्ञ ने मनाली के एक विडीओ में ढेर होती हुई रोड को &qu
Read more

What is a monsoon?

-
Image
Note: This post is written primarily for an Indian audience. - - - What leads to a strong or a weak monsoon? What will happen to the monsoon as the world warms? What happens to the monsoon in an El Niño year? -- These are popular and practical questions that the reader has probably heard, read or thought about. This post has no answers for any of these questions, but instead focuses on a more foundational and theoretical question -- What is a monsoon? Easy! Monsoon means the rainy season, right? This first order approximation is generally accepted as universal truth, since it works for a large part of the country. People equate monsoon with rains, especially summer rains. But what about winter rains? They are usually labelled as "post monsoon", and anything else can be put under "pre-monsoon". If you're a bit more nuanced, you may even label some non-summer rains as "non-monsoon". But the general discussion around rains in India tends to revolve around
Read more

Albedo, and why you should care about it

-
Image
I'm a big fan of albedo . I think this concept is very relevant to the climate system, especially to modern climate change. So this is my attempt to familiarize the reader with this concept and show its practical applicability. What is albedo? In simple terms, it is the ability of a surface to reflect sunlight. A surface with high albedo reflects more sunlight, a surface with low albedo reflects less sunlight. Source There are more general terms, such as reflectance, which are used in other sciences. For the sake of climate, we are primarily interested in sunlight. Albedo values lie between 0-1. The overall, average albedo of the Earth is 0.30. This means that 30% of sunlight is reflected back. The rest is absorbed and radiated as heat. Greenhouse gases tend to trap the radiated heat. In the context of a warming planet, it might have been more comfortable if the Earth's albedo was higher. A higher albedo would mean lesser sunlight would be absorbed, lesser heat would be radiate
Read more